The coefficient of expansion for water is 207E-6/degC at 20C. Not
really sure that your proposed reason/guess is correct. Actually, I am
sure it is incorrect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_expansion
--R
On 5/26/12 10:16 PM, Fmiser wrote:
Brian Toscano wrote:
Wouldn't that support the theory that the return hose should
be larger?
The return hose is 5/8 and the supply is 11/16.
Oh. Uh. I can read. I guess just not very well.
Ummmm. Because the water will have been cooled, and so is more
dense?
-- Philip, now just guessing.
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
