I've been espousing the idea for awhile. I have 2 steps though. If a plurality of people vote for none of the above we just run the election again but none of the previous candidates can run again since they obviously were unwanted.
If 3/4 of people vote none of the above we run the election again but none of the candidates can ever run for ANYTHING again, not even dog catcher. In this way you wouldn't have to choose between the lesser of two evils which is still choosing evil after all. -Curt Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:22:45 -0700 From: G Mann <g2ma...@gmail.com> To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Subject: Re: [MBZ] 85 people own half the worlds wealth and 99% of the old citizens Message-ID: <CANTuLYiE-0t51k2262D7rNpvwz=whxpn87q6z+xody2kiow...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Last 10 elections I've voted in I wished most strongly for a choice at the ballot that said "NONE OF THE ABOVE" .. if "none of the above" got the most votes, they could never run for or hold public office again in their lifetimes.. Wouldn't that be good? _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
