On Sat, 2 Aug 2014 04:29:40 -0400 Meade Dillon <dillonm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One part that worries me is mention of a "super capacitor" which is > loss-less. THAT would be huge, but I'm not holding my breath.... Supercapacitors are already on the market. Only problem is they are rather expensive. They are a lot lower loss than a chemical battery, they do have some loss (you cannot have current flowing through a wire without having some loss -- unless you have a superconductor, and room-temperature superconductors are a ways off yet). Craig _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
