Who says? Any why would you want a higher rear end for towing? 4.10 IS towing 
gears, so you can climb hills and not eat your transmission. Johnny B is right 
you're thinking like a flatlander on this one. The Sub just basically just a 
pickup with a different body right?
  Also the Suburban has had what like 5 different body styles? Probably more 
its been around since the '20s or '30s I think. You're telling me in all that 
time it NEVER came with a 4.10 rear? I'd think it'd have at worst been a 
factory option.
   
  Boy Scout camp I worked at had a Sub, it'd been the case vehicle for the 
Vinalhaven fire department. Young camp instructor's dream ride, 454, auto 
trans, 4wd, 33" tires and the camp gas pump. Not that it needed the 454, it was 
geared low (maybe even 4.10) and would idle up trees if you needed it to. We'd 
load it until the tires scuffed the fenderliners and it never gave a bit of 
trouble. It was probably an late '80s model, had square headlights in the older 
boxier body style but had EFI.
   
  -Curt
   
  Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:27:12 -0600
From: "Kaleb C. Striplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Oil, oil, which oil!?
To: Mercedes Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

The topic was suburbans, chevy suburbans.  I have no idea what fords 
use.  I just know 4:10 was not availalble from the factory in the 
suburban.


                
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new 
and used cars.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 11 18:40:31 2006
Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33])
        by server5.arterytc5.net with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F7zfb-00041x-0b
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 18:40:31 +0000
Received: from familycomp ([68.106.48.86]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net
        (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP
        id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:37:03 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Bob Rentfro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>     
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:40:23 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
        reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Walmart vs NAPA auto
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mercedes Discussion List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes_striplin.net.striplin.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net>, 
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://striplin.net/pipermail/mercedes_striplin.net>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net>, 
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 18:40:31 -0000

What type is Lee's type?

Also...it would be a little different if Wal Mart wasn't making a hundred 
gagillion bazillion mamillion  dollars yearly. They could afford to do 
things differently, make a little less money and take care of the people who 
work for them.

Bob Rentfro


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Walmart vs NAPA auto


>I feel for her.  Sounds like poor conditions to raise kids in.  However,
> is it Wal-Mart's responsibility to oversee this woman's financial
> state-of-affairs?  It's the MOTHER'S RESPONSIBILITY to take care of
> herself and her children.  Why is this so hard for your type to
> understand?  Corporate America is not here to put the latest Nikes on
> our children's feet.  It's here to make money, and compensate the people
> that help it to do so - AT A RATE/TERMS THEY AGREE TO WHEN THEY'RE 
> HIRED!!!!
>
> p.
>
> lee wrote:
>
>>On Saturday 11 February 2006 8:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>>How can people
>>>working for Walmart have so little income that they qualify for Medicaid?
>>>Even at min wage?
>>>
>>>I'm not being a smart a$$ - I don;t understand how this works.  And if
>>>Walmart is doing this, are all businesses doing the same when they pay 
>>>min
>>>wage?  Or do some pay min wage but provide health insurance for those
>>>employees?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>OK, imagine you are a woman with 2 kids. Your husband left you, or died, 
>>or is
>>in military service overseas. You work at Walmart for $7.50 an hour, but 
>>they
>>keep you at just under 32 hours per week so they don't have to offer you
>>health insurance or other benefits.
>>
>>
>
>>How would you be doing, financially? Do you think you might be under the
>>poverty level? Would it be dicey even paying rent and utilities and 
>>providing
>>food and clothes for your two children? Even if you had worked at Walmart 
>>for
>>the previous two years and qualified for their "health benefits"  you 
>>surely
>>wouldn't be able to kick two hundred bucks per month or more back to 
>>Walmart
>>to pay your share of the cost of those benefits.
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________
> http://www.striplin.net
> For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
> For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net 


Reply via email to