I never drive it on the freeway, so the tall gearing is of no benefit. Mileage around town is abysmal anyway. It has variable valve timing and abundant torque but would be truly fast like 7s 0-60 with a 3.07. So more jump off the line is the goal basically. And yes it is a 2.24 or something now. The only thing missing would be the limited slip. an e500 different would be 3.07 also I think.
On Dec 5, 2016 6:04 PM, "Curley McLain via Mercedes" <mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: I'm with Max. What is the ratio now, and what do you want to accomplish by changing the diff/ratio? Karl Wittnebel via Mercedes <mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com> > December 5, 2016 at 6:02 PM > > Any opinions on whether a 2.65 from a 124 300d would be a worthwhile swap > into the e420? A 3.07 or whatever out of a 450 would be better, but some > internal swapping is required. > _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com On Dec 5, 2016 6:04 PM, "Curley McLain via Mercedes" <mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: I'm with Max. What is the ratio now, and what do you want to accomplish by changing the diff/ratio? Karl Wittnebel via Mercedes <mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com> > December 5, 2016 at 6:02 PM > > Any opinions on whether a 2.65 from a 124 300d would be a worthwhile swap > into the e420? A 3.07 or whatever out of a 450 would be better, but some > internal swapping is required. > _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com