Those are different levels of technology. I'd guess the 302 was 20
years newer, from a time where they were trying somewhat to g et more
efficiency.
the M103 , 420 and 560 are all contemporary, so no technical, or
efficiency differences.
Craig via Mercedes <mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com>
February 17, 2017 at 5:01 PM
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:51:11 -0500 Floyd Thursby via Mercedes
We had a couple of Willys Utility Wagons when we lived in Colorado.
The first had a "Hurricane Six" inline six cylinder. It had a modest
amount of power and got horrible fuel mileage (10 - 12 mpg).
The second had a Ford 302 V-8. It had a LOT more power and got noticably
better fuel mileage (16 - 18 mpg) to boot.
Craig
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
