I disagree. Hagerty values are: #1 - $18,900
#2 - $10,600 #3 - $6,300 #4 - $2,100 Now this is far from being a concours quality car. I think we can agree on that. So let’s say it’s a #2, which would be considered “Excellent”. > “#2 vehicles could win a local or regional show. They can be former #1 > vehicles that have been driven or have aged. Seasoned observers will have to > look closely for flaws, but will be able to find some not seen by the general > public. The paint, chrome, glass and finishes will all appear as excellent. > No excessive smoke will be seen on startup, no unusual noises will emanate > from the engine. The vehicle will drive as a new vehicle of its era would. > The one word description for #2 vehicles is "excellent.”” Yeah, don’t think it’s quite there. Close, for sure, but not quite considering the rust issues. Heck, even the seller presents it as a driver quality car. #3? Better than a number three, I think. Probably in the $7k-$8k range would be realistic. We’ll see. -D > On May 17, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Andrew Strasfogel <astrasfo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Not really, when you consider the restoration costs for a shabby example. > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes > <mercedes@okiebenz.com <mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com>> wrote: > https://seattle.craigslist.org/see/cto/6129304306.html > <https://seattle.craigslist.org/see/cto/6129304306.html> > > -D > > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com <http://www.okiebenz.com/> > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > <http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/> > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > <http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com> > > _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
