Oooh, can we apply that to military pork?
-Curt
From: Meade Dillon via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com>
To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com>
Cc: Meade Dillon <dillonm...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 1, 2017 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] big oil dying (again)
Correct, they should not fund NIH, unless it can be done constitutionally
under the heading of national security / defense.
Anything other spending should probably require a national referendum vote
to approve the funding, which expires annually and requires another
national referendum vote to re-approve it. THEN the taxpayers will be able
to decide if they want to spend their money on it or not. Good ideas and
worthy causes will get funded. Stupid pet projects (pork) will quickly
die. Watch our national budget shrink by about 75% overnight!
-------------
Max
Charleston SC
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 6:02 AM, Karl Wittnebel via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> Let me get this straight. You are saying the NIH should not be funding
> biomedical research, because of a document written in the 18th century?
>
>
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
