The NIH question is germane to the central discussion of whether the government should fund research on anything not expressly laid out in the constitution, e.g. solar power, and why or why not.
On Jul 3, 2017 6:19 AM, "Curley McLain via Mercedes" <mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: who started the tangent with NIH funding? Paraphrasing Winston Churchill: those who, in their youth, are not liberal, have no heart. Those who, in maturity, are not conservative, have no brain Karl Wittnebel via Mercedes wrote: > Public support for solar energy is at least tangentially related to diesel > cars as a putative alternative. Oaths of office and marriage vows are > pretty far afield. > _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
