John Peterson wrote:
> I warned him
> that the '96 non turbo would be slow,
I believe the 24v NA engine is between the 90-93 2.5 and '87 3.0
as far as acceleration goes. And not a hint of turbo lag.
The 24v intercooled turbo ('98-99) is quite quick for a pre CDI diesel.
> I personally have been toying with the idea of getting a 190 2.6 gasser
> for a third car here, along with my question about the later Diesels
> above, anybody have a 190? Opinions?
The only 190 I've driven is my 16v. Although the 16v is entertaining,
it should be observed that MBUSA rated the 2.6 at 162hp and the 16v
at 167hp. Both require premium. The 2.6 is a heavy engine in a W201,
but on the other hand, the 16v has the heaviest chassis in the W201
lineup so that should even out. My stick shift 16v weighs almost
exactly (within 20lb) as much as my automatic '87 2.5 turbodiesel,
due to the bigger wheels, fancy seats, spoilers and fender flares,
and SLS. It's going to be a hefty little car if I ever get around
to intercooling my 2.5 turbo and sticking it in the 16v car.
