John:
   Looking up Plasma, I can see your point. 2006 the technology has been 
improved...what I do not like about 37 inch display or greater, is the 
quality of the picture. They take a small image and blow it up to a 
larger size. You have all sort of problems to overcome and quality is 
not that good compared to say a 27 inch TV .....I was mostly using info 
I have learned in 27 inch and below CRT, show the best compared to others.
           Plasma is the big screen and you have distortion. It's like 
taking a 35mm picture and blowing it up to  37 by  24 inches. The 
picture is blurred, grains appear, and the like...I prefer the 27 inch 
size because the overall quality is much better..

Bill
Little recap of this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_display

Until quite recently, the superior brightness, faster response time, 
greater color spectrum, and wider viewing angle </wiki/Viewing_angle> of 
color plasma video displays, when compared with LCD televisions 
</wiki/Liquid_crystal_display_television>, made them one of the most 
popular forms of display for HDTV </wiki/HDTV> flat panel displays 
</wiki/Flat_panel_display>. For a long time it was widely believed that 
LCD technology was suited only to smaller sized televisions, and could 
not compete with plasma technology at larger sizes, particularly 40 
inches and above.

However, since then, improvements in LCD technology have narrowed the 
technological gap. The lower weight, falling prices, higher available 
resolution, which is important for HDTV, and often lower electrical 
power consumption of LCDs make them competitive against plasma displays 
in the television set market. As of late 2006, analysts note that LCDs 
are overtaking plasmas, particularly in the important 40-inch (1.0 m) 
and above segment where plasma had previously enjoyed strong dominance a 
couple of years before.^[1] <#_note-0> Another industry trend is the 
consolidation of manufacturers of plasma displays, with around fifty 
brands available but only five manufacturers.


John Freer wrote:
> Bill, all the info I read said the Plasma was better for action sports
> although the LCD is catching up with faster refresh rates. I saw this
> demonstrated in a Big Box store showing a NASCAR race tape side by
> side. LCD had shadows (ghosts) behind the cars, Plasma did not. Sets
> were made by the same maker.
>
> John
>
> On 10/29/07, b_gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> The best resolution right now is the 1080i. It's has a resolution of
>> 1920 by 1080 which  is just under the resolution of 16 mm film( 1600 by
>> 1156 ). You can adjust your monitor on your computer to see the
>> difference. Picture quality will go down i.e. 720i is 1920 by 720. The
>> old picture quality on TV for the last 55 years has been NTSC which has
>> a resolution of 680 by 480.
>>        The number of information displayed on a screen is 1920 times
>> 1080 equals 2,073,600. 1920 times 720 equals 1,382,400 and the old
>> picture we has seen for 55 years on TV is 640 times 480 equal 307,200.
>> Sport Jocks will as if the ball went foul and show the image on NTSC
>> which does not really show the  world that we sell with our eyes. It was
>> a joke and people not knowing will argue about the foul ball forever. To
>> summary this issue, the higher the resolution, the better the quality,
>> you can see line cracks on people's skin, and the image is on the low
>> level of showing the real world as seen through our eyes.
>>    If you want the best color display, Sony or/and Panasonic has the
>> best. If you select RCA and make a comment about the color of the person
>> clothing, you are really not seeing what your eye see. There is a big
>> shift in the color Hues.
>>    If you like to watch the soaps, theater, talk show on TV, go with
>> the plasma. Action viewing, sports, movies, and the like require the
>> CRT. CRT will keep up with the movement of action as the plasma does not
>> and shows blurs.
>>     720 P and the like, in my point of view, will be slow to come on
>> line. The media has resisted for over 50 years, and another change will
>> cost more.
>>    One finally point, not all TV stations have HD cameras. If they buy
>> a cheap one, your see a cheap picture in HD. Colors will be poor,
>> resolution  like 720 and the like. All the major league football and
>> baseball have the best equipment, therefore, the best picture will be
>> displayed on your HD 1080i....
>>
>> Check the like out for further info:
>> Bill
>> 1981 300 TD
>>
>> http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6361600-1.html
>>
>> Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
>>     
>>> I went and looked at some TV's.  Went to dead sams, worst buy, and wally
>>> world.  I have a few people(not working at the store, people I know)
>>> tell me that DLP is the best.  What do you all think?  They seem to have
>>> bigger screen and cheaper.  AT walmart, they had some of the 1080P and
>>> 720P LCD and plasmas.  It seemed like maybe the LCD had a better
>>> picture.  Could have been how it was adjusted at the store too.  I could
>>> not really tell for sure if the 1080P was that much better than the
>>> 720P.  Is it really paying a big different for the higher resolution?
>>> Also, Walmart had a couple of 50" DLP models, one was an RCA for $9xx,
>>> the other I think was a phillips for $8xx.  Seems like a good deal to
>>> me.  The picture on the RCA was better than the phillips, but again,
>>> they might not have been adjusted very good.  The RCA didnt seem to have
>>> as good of a picture as the LCD's and plasmas.  It was a 720P.  I have
>>> also heard the DLP is better in the fact that when it comes time to
>>> replace the bulb, its easier and cheaper to do.
>>>
>>>       
>> _______________________________________
>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>> For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
>> For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>> http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
> For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>
>   

_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to