The question is if the situation had of been reversed how would the South have reacted? Would they have said "in the interest of freedom we'll let the north go on it's own" or would they have have gone north with an army to kick some bottom?
Hendrik Royce Engler wrote: > andrew strasfogel wrote: > >> Are there still reasonable people (emphasis) who believe the South should >> won the war to continue the practice of slavery? If so, I would be amazed >> to find any such on this list. >> >> >> > > Actually, I do believe I'm a pretty reasonable guy, but I also know that the > War of Northern Aggression was not fought by the South to continue slavery. > The vast majority of Southerners did not own slaves and did not favor > slavery. By the time the North invaded the South, slavery was in decline > and would have ended anyway because it didn't make economic sense. No, the > war was about the North's tendency to try to dictate to other folks how they > were going to run their business, kinda like the revolutionary war was about > the British telling the colonists how they were going to run their > business...and kinda like liberals think they can tell the rest of us what > to think and how we should handle our business. It's about freedom. > > Royce > _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
