Alex Chamberlain wrote: "Are you arguing that the Supremes never make mistakes, or are you playing Humpty Dumpty with the adjective "constitutional"? If the former, Mitch's point was that such a claim is prima facie untrue."
I don't know what playing humpty dumpty means (I am not one of the kings horses or the kings men), but my point was that while someone might say that the Supreme Court wrongly decided something, that it is inaccurate to say that the Supreme Court's decisions can be "unconstitutional." Regardless of whether we like it (or not), when the Supreme Court interprets the constitution and issues a decision it cannot be unconstitutional because the Court is the entity that is responsible for interpreting the constitution. Thinking that the Court made a bad decision is one thing arguing that what they did was unconstitutional is another. Donald H. Snook _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
