Alex Chamberlain wrote: > By the same logic a cook cannot be accused of making an inedible meal, > because cooks produce food, and food is by definition that which is > edible.
Maybe the difference is semantics. We say 'unconstitutional', Snook says 'potential for future overturn'. He's in a profession where he's not allowed to say a judge isn't a candidate for sainthood. I can remember one time when my now ex-governor claimed that a circuit judge 'found his law degree in a Cracker Jack box'. Some people were suggesting that the attorney grievance commission should censure the governor (a licensed attorney himself) for the offense of disparaging a judge. Mitch. _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com