On 11/25/2016 04:28 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Gregory Szorc <gregory.sz...@gmail.com>
# Date 1480035243 28800
# Thu Nov 24 16:54:03 2016 -0800
# Node ID 328d95ac1fd128359a2665f2959e030ee8cce046
# Parent 4fffbdc2bca22e666482b55562c0e592c8a68027
repair: determine what upgrade will do
This commit is rather large. It started off as multiple commits
but I couldn't figure out a good way to split up the functionality
while still conveying the overall strategy. To the reviewer, I
apologize.
From a reviewer: this changeset is just too large, I've currently too
much backlog on my plate to dive into such scary monster. I've looked
into that area myself and I don't see why we could not have something
more iterative. I could see two ways to go here,
Proposal 1: detect all then implement all
1. detect possible upgrade A
2. detect possible upgrade B
3. detect possible upgrade C
4. detect possible upgrade D
5. implement upgrade A
6. implement upgrade B
7. implement upgrade C
8. implement upgrade D
Proposal 2: detect then implement iteratively
1. detect possible upgrade A
2. implement upgrade A
3. detect possible upgrade B
4. implement upgrade B
5. detect possible upgrade C
6. implement upgrade C
7. detect possible upgrade D
8. implement upgrade D
Can get your to submit a new series with smaller patches? Ping me on IRC
if you have extra questions. (I would not be surprised if we end with
multiple sub-series).
Cheers,
--
Pierre-Yves David
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
