Sounds good to me, I'm happy to follow the comment in revlog.py On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 at 13:31 Pierre-Yves David < pierre-yves.da...@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> > > On 12/24/2016 05:36 PM, Remi Chaintron wrote: > > # HG changeset patch > > # User Remi Chaintron <r...@fb.com> > > # Date 1482451718 18000 > > # Thu Dec 22 19:08:38 2016 -0500 > > # Node ID c1bd9b7750cdfe1f2a1437e4ba0ed8f6e48b2dd1 > > # Parent 4f72f28e527c72cae072880b8fa1610c0289dded > > documentation: better censor flag documentation. > > > > diff --git a/mercurial/help/internals/revlogs.txt > b/mercurial/help/internals/revlogs.txt > > --- a/mercurial/help/internals/revlogs.txt > > +++ b/mercurial/help/internals/revlogs.txt > > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ > > Absolute offset of revision data from beginning of revlog. > > 6-7 (2 bytes) > > Bit flags impacting revision behavior. The following bit offsets > define: > > - 0: 'censor' extension flag. > > + 0: REVIDX_ISCENSORED indicates the revision has censored metadata. > > From my understanding of censor, I would have expected something more > like "the revision content is censored". If I remember correctly, the > censors flag means the revision content has been nuked, the metadata are > more a secondary things that give a bit more details about that nuking. > > What do you think ? > > > 8-11 (4 bytes) > > Compressed length of revision data / chunk as stored in revlog. > > 12-15 (4 bytes) > > _______________________________________________ > > Mercurial-devel mailing list > > Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org > > https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel > > > > -- > Pierre-Yves David > _______________________________________________ > Mercurial-devel mailing list > Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org > https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel > -- Rémi
_______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
