Denis Laxalde <denis.laxa...@logilab.fr> writes: > Pierre-Yves David a écrit : >> On 11/08/2016 03:19 PM, Denis Laxalde wrote: >>> # HG changeset patch >>> # User Denis Laxalde <denis.laxa...@logilab.fr> >>> # Date 1475935828 -7200 >>> # Sat Oct 08 16:10:28 2016 +0200 >>> # Node ID 35c0f05d694cb9541d60bad9a940cb93a39d615d >>> # Parent b5d3d230bbc64d44968a9912e8e72aac8236522a >>> # EXP-Topic evolve-ui >>> summary: add evolution "troubles" information to parents header lines >>> >>> Extend labels of the `parent: ` line according to what `hg log` >>> displays when >>> coming from changeset_printer. This would make this line appear the >>> same in >>> log and summary with custom colors in particular. >>> >>> Extend that line with "troubles" information in parentheses, when the >>> parent >>> is troubled. >> >> I know there have been objection against that, but I cannot remember >> which one and why. Can you dig the mailing list a bit to see if you find >> something? >> >> Regarding the form, I would probably drop the "troubles:" part. eg: >> >> parent: 15:73568ab6879d tip (unstable) >> >> Maybe we could use something else that (), but that seems fine so lets >> stay with this. > > Digging (a bit) the mailing list and only found this thread > https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2015-December/076406.html > which does not specifically concerns the "troubles information in > parentheses" thing. > > That being said, if you think this is controversial, I'm very fine > giving up on extending the summary line. > > I still think it is worth having the labels consistent between log and > summary outputs.
I would tend to agree with Denis here. _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
