Excerpts from Pierre-Yves David's message of 2017-01-10 18:22:39 +0100: > > On 01/10/2017 03:45 PM, Yuya Nishihara wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 07:12:27 +0800, Jun Wu wrote: > >> # HG changeset patch > >> # User Jun Wu <qu...@fb.com> > >> # Date 1484002779 -28800 > >> # Tue Jan 10 06:59:39 2017 +0800 > >> # Node ID 24c7b11cecd12762d8238ec96c748131877054be > >> # Parent e44b1d6deadb67908b43909ad920572e3efa38e6 > >> # Available At https://bitbucket.org/quark-zju/hg-draft > >> # hg pull https://bitbucket.org/quark-zju/hg-draft -r > >> 24c7b11cecd1 > >> chg: remove getpager support > >> > >> We have enough bits to switch to the new chg pager code path in runcommand. > >> So just remove the legacy getpager support. > >> > >> This is a red-only patch, and will break chg's pager support temporarily. > > > > I love red patches. Queued the series, thanks! > > Hooray for removing much code! > I'm curious about the breakage however. It is not too important because > chg is experimental but is that breakage fixed by the next changeset? > could have reordered or folded this patch to avoid being temporarily broken?
If Patch 7 and Patch 8 were folded, there would be no breakage. They are separated to comply with the small commit workflow. > > Cheers, > _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel