I'm using the webui, though, so it all looks the same.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Sean Farley <s...@farley.io> wrote: > > Phillip Cohen <phil...@phillip.io> writes: > >>> Also: Jun has suggested to me that we should avoid using "Accept >>> Commit", because that should be a state applied only when a commit is >>> queued to `hg-committed` (either by the reviewer or by a future bot). >>> Once the commit goes to `hg` it should be automatically closed (this >>> should happen today out of the box). >>> >>> Those two things make sense to me, but it's the first I've heard of >>> it, and wanted to make sure there was consensus. >> >> Although, hm, I find this rather annoying because I have to check >> whether a review is a core review or an fb-hgext review before I know >> if I can use the Accept functionality. :/ > > Historically, this is done via different mailing lists: hgsubversion, > hg-git, etc. are all separate lists. I would think fb-hgext and whatnot > could be separate lists, too, no? > > _______________________________________________ > Mercurial-devel mailing list > Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org > https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel > _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel