quark added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D216#3478, @durin42 wrote: > I'd like to hear others chime in on this and https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D215. Do we /know/ that something that's phase-divergent is only divergent by phase? or could the content also be different? Is it possible to have a case in the tests that's both content-divergent and phase-divergent? Good question. I think conceptually phase-divergent could also be seen as content-divergent. I guess most users use source control without even being aware of the "phase" concept so it might be nice to hide that word from UI. Maybe we can merge those two into `divergent()` to simplify the concept a user may face. If something has to distinguish between those details, we can add keyword arguments to the `divergent()` revset. But I'd prefer the default user-facing words to just be `divergent`. Or we can think about alternative ways to display instability in the default log template. REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D216 To: lothiraldan, #hg-reviewers Cc: quark, durin42, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
