On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:26:13 -0600, Kevin Bullock wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2017, at 08:47, Yuya Nishihara <y...@tcha.org> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 12:55:36 -0500, Matt Harbison wrote: > > > >> This is as good a place as any to ask- when do we follow through on the > >> Subrepo Grand Plan? [1] It seems that the long term plan was to always > >> recurse by default, and this -S stuff was a bandaid for issues resolved > >> long ago. I wouldn't do it this cycle, given that we are have way > >> through. There are probably a few things that might need fixing first. > >> (I'm thinking `hg serve --web-conf` doesn't know how to recurse, and I'm > >> sure there are a couple of other odd cases.) Maybe we will want an > >> experimental flag to ease into it. > >> > >> [1] > >> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2011-October/034816.html > > > > The grand plan sounds like a big BC since we have 6-year history of the > > current > > subrepo behavior. > > I don't immediately see anything in that grand plan that breaks compatibility > in any way that matters. It would be awfully nice to finally finish > integrating subrepos into the UI.
I think "make hg <x> recurse subrepos by default" is a noticeable BC since we'll have to specify --no-subrepo to get files in the root repository, for example. _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel