I did a first path through it, the new code seems reasonable and easier
to read than the previous one. Some comments and questions below.
On 4/16/19 7:19 PM, martinvonz (Martin von Zweigbergk) wrote:
martinvonz created this revision.
Herald added subscribers: mercurial-devel, mjpieters.
Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.
REVISION SUMMARY
When copies are stored in changesets, we need a changeset-centric
version of mergecopies() just like we have a changeset-centric version
of pathcopies(). I think the natural way of thinking about
mergecopies() is in terms of pathcopies() from the base to each of the
commits. So if we can rewrite mergecopies() based two such
pathcopies() calls, we'll get the changeset-centric version for
free. That's what this patch does.
I like the approach, if I understand it correctly, we'll have less
duplicated code in the end.
A nice bonus is that it ends up being a lot simpler. mergecopies() has
accumulated a lot of technical debt over time. One good example is the
code for dealing with grafts (the "partial/incomplete/dirty"
stuff). Since pathcopies() already deals with backwards renames and
ping-pong renames, we get that for free.
I've run tests with hard-coded debug logging for "fullcopy" and while
I haven't looked at every difference it produces, all the ones I have
looked at seemed reasonable to me.
How many difference did you had? can you share some example of them with
their explanation?
on related topic, you seems to be fixing a case in
test-fastannotate-hg.t and test-annotate-hg.t that is probably worth
mentioning.
One drawback of the rewritten code is that we may now make
remotefilelog prefetch more files. We used to prefetch files that were
unique to either side of the merge compared to the other. We now
prefetch files that are unique to either sise of the merge compared to
sise → side
the base. This means that if you added the same file to each side, we
would not prefetch it before, but we would now. Such cases are
probably quite rare, but one likely scenario where they happen is when
moving from a commit to its successor (or the other way around). The
user will probably already have the files in the cache in such cases,
so it's probably not a big deal.
Some timings for calculating mergecopies between two revisions (all
using the common ancestor as base):
Which revisions did you pick?
(for the record, the benchmark suite use 1daa622bbe42 and 76caed42cf7c)
In the hg repo:
4.8 4.8: 0.21s -> 0.21s
4.0 4.8: 0.35s -> 0.63s
In and old copy of the mozilla-unified repo:
FIREFOX_BETA_60_BASE^ FIREFOX_BETA_60_BASE: 0.51s -> 0.60s
FIREFOX_NIGHTLY_59_END FIREFOX_BETA_60_BASE: 2.1s -> 2.3s
FIREFOX_BETA_59_END FIREFOX_BETA_60_BASE: 3.1s -> 3.3s
FIREFOX_AURORA_50_BASE FIREFOX_BETA_60_BASE: 30s -> 35s
So it's measurably slower in most cases. Note that merge copies are
not calculated when updating with a clean working copy, which is
probably the most common case. I therefore think the much simpler code
is worth the slowdown.
Do you know where the slowdown comes from ?
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6255
AFFECTED FILES
mercurial/copies.py
tests/test-annotate.t
tests/test-fastannotate-hg.t
tests/test-graft.t
tests/test-rename-merge2.t
CHANGE DETAILS
diff --git a/tests/test-rename-merge2.t b/tests/test-rename-merge2.t
--- a/tests/test-rename-merge2.t
+++ b/tests/test-rename-merge2.t
@@ -433,6 +433,9 @@
--------------
test L:nc a b R:up b W: - 12 merge b no ancestor
--------------
+ all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
+ src: 'a' -> dst: 'b'
+ checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 924404dff337, local: 86a2aa42fc76+, remote: af30c7647fc7
@@ -469,6 +472,9 @@
--------------
test L:up b R:nm a b W: - 13 merge b no ancestor
--------------
+ all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
+ src: 'a' -> dst: 'b'
+ checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 924404dff337, local: 59318016310c+, remote: bdb19105162a
@@ -506,6 +512,9 @@
--------------
test L:nc a b R:up a b W: - 14 merge b no ancestor
--------------
+ all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
+ src: 'a' -> dst: 'b'
+ checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 924404dff337, local: 86a2aa42fc76+, remote: 8dbce441892a
@@ -543,6 +552,9 @@
--------------
test L:up b R:nm a b W: - 15 merge b no ancestor, remove a
--------------
+ all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
+ src: 'a' -> dst: 'b'
+ checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 924404dff337, local: 59318016310c+, remote: bdb19105162a
@@ -580,6 +592,9 @@
--------------
test L:nc a b R:up a b W: - 16 get a, merge b no ancestor
--------------
+ all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
+ src: 'a' -> dst: 'b'
+ checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 924404dff337, local: 86a2aa42fc76+, remote: 8dbce441892a
@@ -617,6 +632,9 @@
--------------
test L:up a b R:nc a b W: - 17 keep a, merge b no ancestor
--------------
+ all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
+ src: 'a' -> dst: 'b'
+ checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 924404dff337, local: 0b76e65c8289+, remote: 4ce40f5aca24
@@ -653,6 +671,9 @@
--------------
test L:nm a b R:up a b W: - 18 merge b no ancestor
--------------
+ all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
+ src: 'a' -> dst: 'b'
+ checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 924404dff337, local: 02963e448370+, remote: 8dbce441892a
@@ -695,6 +716,9 @@
--------------
test L:up a b R:nm a b W: - 19 merge b no ancestor, prompt remove a
--------------
+ all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
+ src: 'a' -> dst: 'b'
+ checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 924404dff337, local: 0b76e65c8289+, remote: bdb19105162a
diff --git a/tests/test-graft.t b/tests/test-graft.t
--- a/tests/test-graft.t
+++ b/tests/test-graft.t
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@
$ hg graft -r 2 --base 3
grafting 2:5c095ad7e90f "2"
+ note: possible conflict - c was deleted and renamed to:
+ a
note: graft of 2:5c095ad7e90f created no changes to commit
Can't continue without starting:
@@ -220,6 +222,9 @@
committing changelog
updating the branch cache
grafting 5:97f8bfe72746 "5"
+ all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
+ src: 'c' -> dst: 'b'
+ checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: True, partial: False
ancestor: 4c60f11aa304, local: 6b9e5368ca4e+, remote: 97f8bfe72746
@@ -233,6 +238,9 @@
$ HGEDITOR=cat hg graft 4 3 --log --debug
scanning for duplicate grafts
grafting 4:9c233e8e184d "4"
+ all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
+ src: 'c' -> dst: 'b'
+ checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: True, partial: False
ancestor: 4c60f11aa304, local: 1905859650ec+, remote: 9c233e8e184d
@@ -1129,7 +1137,6 @@
grafting 2:f58c7e2b28fa "C0"
merging f1e and f1b to f1e
merging f2a and f2c to f2c
- merging f5b and f5a to f5a
Test the cases A.1 (f4x) and A.7 (f3x).
diff --git a/tests/test-fastannotate-hg.t b/tests/test-fastannotate-hg.t
--- a/tests/test-fastannotate-hg.t
+++ b/tests/test-fastannotate-hg.t
@@ -273,37 +273,10 @@
> EOF
$ hg ci -mc -d '3 0'
created new head
-BROKEN: 'a' was copied to 'b' on both sides. We should not get a merge
conflict here
$ hg merge
merging b
- warning: conflicts while merging b! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
- 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
- use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to
abandon
- [1]
- $ cat b
- <<<<<<< working copy: b80e3e32f75a - test: c
- a
- z
- a
- ||||||| base
- =======
- a
- a
- a
- b4
- c
- b5
- >>>>>>> merge rev: 64afcdf8e29e - test: mergeb
- $ cat <<EOF > b
- > a
- > z
- > a
- > b4
- > c
- > b5
- > EOF
- $ hg resolve --mark -q
- $ rm b.orig
+ 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
+ (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ echo d >> b
$ hg ci -mmerge2 -d '4 0'
diff --git a/tests/test-annotate.t b/tests/test-annotate.t
--- a/tests/test-annotate.t
+++ b/tests/test-annotate.t
@@ -273,37 +273,10 @@
> EOF
$ hg ci -mc -d '3 0'
created new head
-BROKEN: 'a' was copied to 'b' on both sides. We should not get a merge
conflict here
$ hg merge
merging b
- warning: conflicts while merging b! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
- 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
- use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to
abandon
- [1]
- $ cat b
- <<<<<<< working copy: b80e3e32f75a - test: c
- a
- z
- a
- ||||||| base
- =======
- a
- a
- a
- b4
- c
- b5
- >>>>>>> merge rev: 64afcdf8e29e - test: mergeb
- $ cat <<EOF > b
- > a
- > z
- > a
- > b4
- > c
- > b5
- > EOF
- $ hg resolve --mark -q
- $ rm b.orig
+ 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
+ (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ echo d >> b
$ hg ci -mmerge2 -d '4 0'
diff --git a/mercurial/copies.py b/mercurial/copies.py
--- a/mercurial/copies.py
+++ b/mercurial/copies.py
@@ -373,57 +373,6 @@
return u1, u2
-def _makegetfctx(ctx):
- """return a 'getfctx' function suitable for _checkcopies usage
-
- We have to re-setup the function building 'filectx' for each
- '_checkcopies' to ensure the linkrev adjustment is properly setup for
- each. Linkrev adjustment is important to avoid bug in rename
- detection. Moreover, having a proper '_ancestrycontext' setup ensures
- the performance impact of this adjustment is kept limited. Without it,
- each file could do a full dag traversal making the time complexity of
- the operation explode (see issue4537).
-
- This function exists here mostly to limit the impact on stable. Feel
- free to refactor on default.
- """
- rev = ctx.rev()
- repo = ctx._repo
- ac = getattr(ctx, '_ancestrycontext', None)
- if ac is None:
- revs = [rev]
- if rev is None:
- revs = [p.rev() for p in ctx.parents()]
- ac = repo.changelog.ancestors(revs, inclusive=True)
- ctx._ancestrycontext = ac
- def makectx(f, n):
- if n in node.wdirfilenodeids: # in a working context?
- if ctx.rev() is None:
- return ctx.filectx(f)
- return repo[None][f]
- fctx = repo.filectx(f, fileid=n)
- # setup only needed for filectx not create from a changectx
- fctx._ancestrycontext = ac
- fctx._descendantrev = rev
- return fctx
- return util.lrucachefunc(makectx)
-
-def _combinecopies(copyfrom, copyto, finalcopy, diverge, incompletediverge):
- """combine partial copy paths"""
- remainder = {}
- for f in copyfrom:
- if f in copyto:
- finalcopy[copyto[f]] = copyfrom[f]
- del copyto[f]
- for f in incompletediverge:
- assert f not in diverge
- ic = incompletediverge[f]
- if ic[0] in copyto:
- diverge[f] = [copyto[ic[0]], ic[1]]
- else:
- remainder[f] = ic
- return remainder
-
def mergecopies(repo, c1, c2, base):
"""
Finds moves and copies between context c1 and c2 that are relevant for
@@ -526,168 +475,93 @@
This is pretty slow when a lot of changesets are involved but will track
all
the copies.
"""
- # In certain scenarios (e.g. graft, update or rebase), base can be
- # overridden We still need to know a real common ancestor in this case We
- # can't just compute _c1.ancestor(_c2) and compare it to ca, because there
- # can be multiple common ancestors, e.g. in case of bidmerge. Because our
- # caller may not know if the revision passed in lieu of the CA is a genuine
- # common ancestor or not without explicitly checking it, it's better to
- # determine that here.
- #
- # base.isancestorof(wc) is False, work around that
- _c1 = c1.p1() if c1.rev() is None else c1
- _c2 = c2.p1() if c2.rev() is None else c2
- # an endpoint is "dirty" if it isn't a descendant of the merge base
- # if we have a dirty endpoint, we need to trigger graft logic, and also
- # keep track of which endpoint is dirty
- dirtyc1 = not base.isancestorof(_c1)
- dirtyc2 = not base.isancestorof(_c2)
- graft = dirtyc1 or dirtyc2
- tca = base
- if graft:
- tca = _c1.ancestor(_c2)
-
- limit = _findlimit(repo, c1, c2)
-
m1 = c1.manifest()
m2 = c2.manifest()
mb = base.manifest()
- # gather data from _checkcopies:
- # - diverge = record all diverges in this dict
- # - copy = record all non-divergent copies in this dict
- # - fullcopy = record all copies in this dict
- # - incomplete = record non-divergent partial copies here
- # - incompletediverge = record divergent partial copies here
- diverge = {} # divergence data is shared
- incompletediverge = {}
- data1 = {'copy': {},
- 'fullcopy': {},
- 'incomplete': {},
- 'diverge': diverge,
- 'incompletediverge': incompletediverge,
- }
- data2 = {'copy': {},
- 'fullcopy': {},
- 'incomplete': {},
- 'diverge': diverge,
- 'incompletediverge': incompletediverge,
- }
+ copies1 = pathcopies(base, c1)
+ copies2 = pathcopies(base, c2)
+
+ inversecopies1 = {}
+ inversecopies2 = {}
+ for dst, src in copies1.items():
+ inversecopies1.setdefault(src, []).append(dst)
+ for dst, src in copies2.items():
+ inversecopies2.setdefault(src, []).append(dst)
+
+ copy = {}
+ diverge = {}
+ renamedelete = {}
+ allsources = set(inversecopies1) | set(inversecopies2)
+ for src in allsources:
+ dsts1 = inversecopies1.get(src)
+ dsts2 = inversecopies2.get(src)
+ if dsts1 and dsts2:
+ # copied/renamed on both sides
+ if src not in m1 and src not in m2:
+ # renamed on both sides
+ dsts1 = set(dsts1)
+ dsts2 = set(dsts2)
+ # If there's some overlap in the rename destinations, we
+ # consider it not divergent. For example, if side 1 copies 'a'
+ # to 'b' and 'c' and deletes 'a', and side 2 copies 'a' to 'c'
+ # and 'd' and deletes 'a'.
Formatting could help this comment a bit. something like
side 1: a -> b -> c
side 2: a -> c -> d
+ if dsts1 & dsts2:
+ for dst in (dsts1 & dsts2):
+ copy[dst] = src
+ else:
+ diverge[src] = sorted(dsts1 | dsts2)
+ elif src in m1 and src in m2:
+ # copied on both sides
+ dsts1 = set(dsts1)
+ dsts2 = set(dsts2)
+ for dst in (dsts1 & dsts2):
+ copy[dst] = src
+ # TODO: Handle cases where it was renamed on one side and copied
+ # on the other side
Is this TODO a regression or some ported limitation.
+ elif dsts1:
+ # copied/renamed only on side 1
+ if src not in m2:
+ # deleted on side 2
+ if src not in m1:
+ # renamed on side 1, deleted on side 2
+ renamedelete[src] = dsts1
+ elif m2[src] != mb[src]:
+ # modified on side 2
+ for dst in dsts1:
+ if dst not in m2:
+ # dst not added on side 2 (handle as regular
+ # "both created" case in manifestmerge in that case)
Can you elaborate a bit on what this case means (and how we deal with
it) especially, what happens if dst is indeed in m2 ?
+ copy[dst] = src
+ elif dsts2:
+ # copied/renamed only on side 2
+ if src not in m1:
+ # deleted on side 1
+ if src not in m2:
+ # renamed on side 2, deleted on side 1
+ renamedelete[src] = dsts2
+ elif m1[src] != mb[src]:
+ # modified on side 1
+ for dst in dsts2:
+ if dst not in m1:
+ # dst not added on side 1 (handle as regular
+ # "both created" case in manifestmerge in that case)
+ copy[dst] = src
Since this seems the very same code as the previous clause, I wonder if
we could factor it out. This would help to prevent subtle bug when we
update it. (the answer might be "no because python is slow).
+ renamedeleteset = set()
+ divergeset = set()
+ for src, dsts in diverge.items():
+ divergeset.update(dsts)
+ for src, dsts in renamedelete.items():
+ renamedeleteset.update(dsts)
small nits: Is there any reason not to use diverge.values and
renamedelete.values here ?
# find interesting file sets from manifests
addedinm1 = m1.filesnotin(mb, repo.narrowmatch())
addedinm2 = m2.filesnotin(mb, repo.narrowmatch())
- bothnew = sorted(addedinm1 & addedinm2)
- if tca == base:
- # unmatched file from base
- u1r, u2r = _computenonoverlap(repo, c1, c2, addedinm1, addedinm2)
- u1u, u2u = u1r, u2r
- else:
- # unmatched file from base (DAG rotation in the graft case)
- u1r, u2r = _computenonoverlap(repo, c1, c2, addedinm1, addedinm2)
- # unmatched file from topological common ancestors (no DAG rotation)
- # need to recompute this for directory move handling when grafting
- mta = tca.manifest()
- u1u, u2u = _computenonoverlap(repo, c1, c2,
- m1.filesnotin(mta, repo.narrowmatch()),
- m2.filesnotin(mta, repo.narrowmatch()),
- debug=False)
-
- for f in u1u:
- _checkcopies(c1, c2, f, base, tca, dirtyc1, limit, data1)
-
- for f in u2u:
- _checkcopies(c2, c1, f, base, tca, dirtyc2, limit, data2)
-
- copy = dict(data1['copy'])
- copy.update(data2['copy'])
- fullcopy = dict(data1['fullcopy'])
- fullcopy.update(data2['fullcopy'])
-
- if dirtyc1:
- _combinecopies(data2['incomplete'], data1['incomplete'], copy, diverge,
- incompletediverge)
- if dirtyc2:
- _combinecopies(data1['incomplete'], data2['incomplete'], copy, diverge,
- incompletediverge)
-
- renamedelete = {}
- renamedeleteset = set()
- divergeset = set()
- for of, fl in list(diverge.items()):
- if len(fl) == 1 or of in c1 or of in c2:
- del diverge[of] # not actually divergent, or not a rename
- if of not in c1 and of not in c2:
- # renamed on one side, deleted on the other side, but filter
- # out files that have been renamed and then deleted
- renamedelete[of] = [f for f in fl if f in c1 or f in c2]
- renamedeleteset.update(fl) # reverse map for below
- else:
- divergeset.update(fl) # reverse map for below
+ u1, u2 = _computenonoverlap(repo, c1, c2, addedinm1, addedinm2)
- bothdiverge = {}
- bothincompletediverge = {}
- remainder = {}
- both1 = {'copy': {},
- 'fullcopy': {},
- 'incomplete': {},
- 'diverge': bothdiverge,
- 'incompletediverge': bothincompletediverge
- }
- both2 = {'copy': {},
- 'fullcopy': {},
- 'incomplete': {},
- 'diverge': bothdiverge,
- 'incompletediverge': bothincompletediverge
- }
- for f in bothnew:
- _checkcopies(c1, c2, f, base, tca, dirtyc1, limit, both1)
- _checkcopies(c2, c1, f, base, tca, dirtyc2, limit, both2)
- if dirtyc1 and dirtyc2:
- remainder = _combinecopies(both2['incomplete'], both1['incomplete'],
- copy, bothdiverge, bothincompletediverge)
- remainder1 = _combinecopies(both1['incomplete'], both2['incomplete'],
- copy, bothdiverge, bothincompletediverge)
- remainder.update(remainder1)
- elif dirtyc1:
- # incomplete copies may only be found on the "dirty" side for bothnew
- assert not both2['incomplete']
- remainder = _combinecopies({}, both1['incomplete'], copy, bothdiverge,
- bothincompletediverge)
- elif dirtyc2:
- assert not both1['incomplete']
- remainder = _combinecopies({}, both2['incomplete'], copy, bothdiverge,
- bothincompletediverge)
- else:
- # incomplete copies and divergences can't happen outside grafts
- assert not both1['incomplete']
- assert not both2['incomplete']
- assert not bothincompletediverge
- for f in remainder:
- assert f not in bothdiverge
- ic = remainder[f]
- if ic[0] in (m1 if dirtyc1 else m2):
- # backed-out rename on one side, but watch out for deleted files
- bothdiverge[f] = ic
- for of, fl in bothdiverge.items():
- if len(fl) == 2 and fl[0] == fl[1]:
- copy[fl[0]] = of # not actually divergent, just matching renames
-
- # Sometimes we get invalid copies here (the "and not remotebase" in
- # _checkcopies() seems suspicious). Filter them out.
- for dst, src in fullcopy.copy().items():
- if src not in mb:
- del fullcopy[dst]
- # Sometimes we forget to add entries from "copy" to "fullcopy", so fix
- # that up here
- for dst, src in copy.items():
- fullcopy[dst] = src
- # Sometimes we forget to add entries from "diverge" to "fullcopy", so fix
- # that up here
- for src, dsts in diverge.items():
- for dst in dsts:
- fullcopy[dst] = src
-
+ fullcopy = copies1.copy()
+ fullcopy.update(copies2)
if not fullcopy:
return copy, {}, diverge, renamedelete, {}
@@ -752,7 +626,7 @@
movewithdir = {}
# check unaccounted nonoverlapping files against directory moves
- for f in u1r + u2r:
+ for f in u1 + u2:
if f not in fullcopy:
for d in dirmove:
if f.startswith(d):
@@ -899,99 +773,6 @@
except StopIteration:
return False
-def _checkcopies(srcctx, dstctx, f, base, tca, remotebase, limit, data):
- """
- check possible copies of f from msrc to mdst
-
- srcctx = starting context for f in msrc
- dstctx = destination context for f in mdst
- f = the filename to check (as in msrc)
- base = the changectx used as a merge base
- tca = topological common ancestor for graft-like scenarios
- remotebase = True if base is outside tca::srcctx, False otherwise
- limit = the rev number to not search beyond
- data = dictionary of dictionary to store copy data. (see mergecopies)
-
- note: limit is only an optimization, and provides no guarantee that
- irrelevant revisions will not be visited
- there is no easy way to make this algorithm stop in a guaranteed way
- once it "goes behind a certain revision".
- """
-
- msrc = srcctx.manifest()
- mdst = dstctx.manifest()
- mb = base.manifest()
- mta = tca.manifest()
- # Might be true if this call is about finding backward renames,
- # This happens in the case of grafts because the DAG is then rotated.
- # If the file exists in both the base and the source, we are not looking
- # for a rename on the source side, but on the part of the DAG that is
- # traversed backwards.
- #
- # In the case there is both backward and forward renames (before and after
- # the base) this is more complicated as we must detect a divergence.
- # We use 'backwards = False' in that case.
- backwards = not remotebase and base != tca and f in mb
- getsrcfctx = _makegetfctx(srcctx)
- getdstfctx = _makegetfctx(dstctx)
-
- if msrc[f] == mb.get(f) and not remotebase:
- # Nothing to merge
- return
-
- of = None
- seen = {f}
- for oc in getsrcfctx(f, msrc[f]).ancestors():
- of = oc.path()
- if of in seen:
- # check limit late - grab last rename before
- if oc.linkrev() < limit:
- break
- continue
- seen.add(of)
-
- # remember for dir rename detection
- if backwards:
- data['fullcopy'][of] = f # grafting backwards through renames
- else:
- data['fullcopy'][f] = of
- if of not in mdst:
- continue # no match, keep looking
- if mdst[of] == mb.get(of):
- return # no merge needed, quit early
- c2 = getdstfctx(of, mdst[of])
- # c2 might be a plain new file on added on destination side that is
- # unrelated to the droids we are looking for.
- cr = _related(oc, c2)
- if cr and (of == f or of == c2.path()): # non-divergent
- if backwards:
- data['copy'][of] = f
- elif of in mb:
- data['copy'][f] = of
- elif remotebase: # special case: a <- b <- a -> b "ping-pong"
rename
- data['copy'][of] = f
- del data['fullcopy'][f]
- data['fullcopy'][of] = f
- else: # divergence w.r.t. graft CA on one side of topological CA
- for sf in seen:
- if sf in mb:
- assert sf not in data['diverge']
- data['diverge'][sf] = [f, of]
- break
- return
-
- if of in mta:
- if backwards or remotebase:
- data['incomplete'][of] = f
- else:
- for sf in seen:
- if sf in mb:
- if tca == base:
- data['diverge'].setdefault(sf, []).append(f)
- else:
- data['incompletediverge'][sf] = [of, f]
- return
-
def duplicatecopies(repo, wctx, rev, fromrev, skiprev=None):
"""reproduce copies from fromrev to rev in the dirstate
To: martinvonz, #hg-reviewers
Cc: mjpieters, mercurial-devel
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
--
Pierre-Yves David
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel