martinvonz added a comment.
In D7121#104673 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121#104673>, @marmoute wrote: > In D7121#104672 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121#104672>, @martinvonz wrote: > >> In D7121#104671 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121#104671>, @marmoute wrote: >> >>> In D7121#104546 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121#104546>, @martinvonz wrote: >>> >>>>> […] >>>> >>>> So there seems to be a measurable difference. Could just the function call overhead be that whole difference? Anyway, it doesn't seem worth spending time trying to figure out. >>> >>> Function call can have a large overhead, how many revision are we talking about here ? >> >> 5627 > > That is not much to be honest. How do you measure this? By running exactly the command I shared earlier :P This is a version of mozilla-unified I've created by running `hg convert --config experimental.copies.write-to=changeset-only`. REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121/new/ REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121 To: marmoute, #hg-reviewers, martinvonz Cc: martinvonz, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
