marmoute added a comment.
In D7121#104675 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121#104675>, @marmoute wrote: > In D7121#104674 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121#104674>, @martinvonz wrote: > >> In D7121#104673 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121#104673>, @marmoute wrote: >> >>> In D7121#104672 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121#104672>, @martinvonz wrote: >>> >>>> In D7121#104671 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121#104671>, @marmoute wrote: >>>> >>>>> In D7121#104546 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121#104546>, @martinvonz wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> […] >>>>>> >>>>>> So there seems to be a measurable difference. Could just the function call overhead be that whole difference? Anyway, it doesn't seem worth spending time trying to figure out. >>>>> >>>>> Function call can have a large overhead, how many revision are we talking about here ? >>>> >>>> 5627 >>> >>> That is not much to be honest. How do you measure this? >> >> By running exactly the command I shared earlier :P This is a version of mozilla-unified I've created by running `hg convert --config experimental.copies.write-to=changeset-only`. > > I meant the number of changeset :-) I did a fresh clone and fished this myself. I indeed see the same number hg log -T '.\n' -r FIREFOX_BETA_60_BASE%FIREFOX_BETA_59_END | wc -l REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121/new/ REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121 To: marmoute, #hg-reviewers, martinvonz Cc: martinvonz, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
