At 10:47 AM 6/11/99 -0500, JON STRAYER wrote: >> As I said, unless there is an intervention or someone just >> takes it upon themselves to double-check those exponents >> with software other than George's (the very basis >> of doublechecking), we won't get confirmation of >> M37 until 2003.... <sigh> > >So? It's not like we are running out of work. > But it seems that our work should be better prioritized. There are small exponents that were assigned at least 17 months ago that haven't been finished. +----------------------------------------------+ | Jud "program first and think later" McCranie | +----------------------------------------------+ ________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jeff Woods
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Brian J. Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Paul Derbyshire
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Yvan Dutil
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Yvan Dutil
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Brian J. Beesley
- Mersenne: 286's and 386's running Prime95 Marc Getty
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents JON STRAYER
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Mikus Grinbergs
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jeff Woods
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Aaron Blosser
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Aaron Blosser
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Sturle Sunde
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Aaron Blosser
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Sturle Sunde
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie