At 03:53 PM 6/20/99 -0700, Luke Welsh wrote:
>As long as we're fitting data to a curve, how about substituting
>pi/2 for 3/2?
If you fit the curve to the data, 3/2 works a lot better. The best fit is for
a slope of 1.4785, which has a very high correlation coefficient of 0.996.
+----------------------------------------------+
| Jud "program first and think later" McCranie |
+----------------------------------------------+
________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
