I recommend to replace the expression " (3/2)^n " by "
(PI*SQRT(2))/3". Then
we receive
1,480960969 instead of 3/2 and the correlation coefficient would be
almost
just the same
(0,996117397). Why then to replace? I think, there must be some
relation
between the Mersenne problem and the partition function (considering
the
Hardy-Ramanujan-Rademacher formula). Other factors must be found
somehow and
once in the (I hope "next" ) future.
Best regards
Paul La'ng
Budapest, Hungary
Jud McCranie wrote:
> If you take the following comma delimited file into a spreadsheet, and
> graph it (say with a line chart) it shows the relationship of Mersenne
> exponents to their index, for the first 37 Mersenne primes. The first
> column is the log of (3/2)^n, the second column is the log of the exponent
> of the nth Mersenne prime......
> +----------------------------------------------+
> | Jud "program first and think later" McCranie |
> +----------------------------------------------+
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
