> even bigger prime. If for example, 6*M(p)+1 divides M(M(p)), then it must > be prime! Before anybody gets overexcited at the last posting... It is TRUE that if 2k.M(p)+1 divides M(M(p)), M(p) is prime, and k<2M(p)+2, then 2k.M(p)+1 is prime. However, unless I'm mistaken, non-divisibility does not prove compositeness. You could walk past a prime (in fact, you'd expect to walk past several) and you'd never know... Chris _________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
- Mersenne: M(M(127)) and other M(M(p)) Chris Nash
- Re: Mersenne: M(M(127)) and other M(M(p)) Lucas Wiman
- Re: Mersenne: M(M(127)) and other M(M(p)) Jeff Woods
- Re: Mersenne: M(M(127)) and other M(M(p)) Chris Nash
- Re: Mersenne: M(M(127)) and other M(M(p)) Chris Nash
- Re: Mersenne: M(M(127)) and other M(M(p)) Chris Nash
- Re: Mersenne: M(M(127)) and other M(M(p)) Chris Nash
- Re: Mersenne: M(M(127)) and other M(M(p)) Will Edgington
- Mersenne: GIMPS client output Darxus
- RE: Mersenne: GIMPS client output Rick Pali
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS client output Lucas Wiman
- Re: Mersenne: GIMPS client output Eric Hahn
- RE: Mersenne: GIMPS client output Rick Pali
- RE: Mersenne: GIMPS client output Eric Hahn
- Decamega Tests (was: RE: Mersenne: GIMPS... Brian J. Beesley