On Sat, 12 May 2001 11:27:34 -0400, Jud McCranie wrote: >At 10:22 AM 5/12/2001 -0400, George Woltman wrote: > >>Dietmar's guess was accurate. Six weeks ago there were grumblings on the >>list that we were making slow progress on double-checking milestones. I >>promised to make monthly checks of my database and the server's database >>and make exponents available for triple-checking when necessary. > >Checking the status page, we seem to be stuck on 26 exponents between >6,325,000 and 6,972,593 - that haven't had one LL test. Doesn't that most likely mean that those exponents have been checked out, and allowed to expire, multiple times? Nathan _________________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
- Mersenne: missing exponents? Achim Passauer
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Dieter Schmitt
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Achim Passauer
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Martijn Kruithof
- Mersenne: Re: 26 exponents Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? mohk
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Chris Jefferson
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? George Woltman
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Nathan Russell
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Chris Jefferson
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Brian J. Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Nathan Russell
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Brian J. Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Nathan Russell
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Daran
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Jeff Woods
- Re: Mersenne: missing exponents? Aaron Blosser