On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
<samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> + for (i = 0; i < NVC0_MAX_IMAGES; ++i) {
>>
>>
>> Any reason not to intend this second for loop?
>
>
> Presumably you meant indent? The answer is no because it's the coding style
> in that function.
I wouldn't be against fixing that, but it should be done as a separate patch.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
