On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> + for (i = 0; i < NVC0_MAX_IMAGES; ++i) { >> >> >> Any reason not to intend this second for loop? > > > Presumably you meant indent? The answer is no because it's the coding style > in that function.
I wouldn't be against fixing that, but it should be done as a separate patch. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev