These patches are not fixing any known bug. But they are adding the previously missing surface size limits for the hardware. It's really hard to hit these limits. But, let's pick them to stable for the sake of completion. Thanks for marking them for mesa-stable.
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Andres Gomez <ago...@igalia.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 18:21 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >> On 3 July 2017 at 21:14, Andres Gomez <ago...@igalia.com> wrote: >> > Actually, forgot to add -stable into CC. >> > >> > -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> > From: Andres Gomez <ago...@igalia.com> >> > To: Anuj Phogat <anuj.pho...@gmail.com>, mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org >> > Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] intel/isl: Use uint64_t to store >> > total surface size >> > Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 23:02:31 +0300 >> > >> > It looks like we could want these 2 into -stable (?) >> > >> >> Shouldn't hurt, despite that most of the >> isl_surf_init/isl_surf_get_[a-z]_surf handling is a simple assert(ok). >> I'll leave the call to the experts, but my take is "don't bother". > > OK, I'll wait to see if Anuj has anything to say before picking this > one, then. > > Thanks for the feedback! > > -- > Br, > > Andres _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
