OK, thanks for the feedback! ☺ On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 09:46 -0700, Anuj Phogat wrote: > These patches are not fixing any known bug. But they are adding the > previously missing surface size limits for the hardware. It's really hard > to hit these limits. But, let's pick them to stable for the sake of > completion. > Thanks for marking them for mesa-stable. > > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Andres Gomez <ago...@igalia.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 18:21 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > > > On 3 July 2017 at 21:14, Andres Gomez <ago...@igalia.com> wrote: > > > > Actually, forgot to add -stable into CC. > > > > > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > > > From: Andres Gomez <ago...@igalia.com> > > > > To: Anuj Phogat <anuj.pho...@gmail.com>, mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] intel/isl: Use uint64_t to store > > > > total surface size > > > > Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 23:02:31 +0300 > > > > > > > > It looks like we could want these 2 into -stable (?) > > > > > > > > > > Shouldn't hurt, despite that most of the > > > isl_surf_init/isl_surf_get_[a-z]_surf handling is a simple assert(ok). > > > I'll leave the call to the experts, but my take is "don't bother". > > > > OK, I'll wait to see if Anuj has anything to say before picking this > > one, then. > > > > Thanks for the feedback! > > > > -- > > Br, > > > > Andres > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-stable mailing list > mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-stable -- Br,
Andres _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
