On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:00 AM, Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Robert Foss <robert.f...@collabora.com> > wrote: >> Hey, >> >> On 01/13/2018 12:49 AM, Gurchetan Singh wrote: >>> >>> We can define accessor functions too (not ptrs), then the struct is >>> opaque >>> and you can do your own accessor implementation if aligning is not >>> possible >>> or desired. >>> >>> >>> Accessor functions in libdrm sound good to me. >> >> >> Alright, this seems straight forward enough. As for the accessor >> implementations, does anyone mind if I start out with support for multiple >> planes even if the buffer handle currently doesn't contain multi plane >> support >> in various fields (fds, strides, offsets, etc.). > > That would be good. Once we convert over to the accessors in users, > then we can change the handle.
Sounds good to me. FYI the handle used by cros_gralloc can already describe multiple planes. Best regards, Tomasz _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
