On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:12 AM Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> wrote: > > Seems reasonable to me...in the old Subversion days, we called it > 'trunk'...then 'master' with Git...but calling the main development > branch 'main' is arguably the simplest and most descriptive term. > > One thing we'll have to coordinate: getting Gitlab CI / Marge and the > Intel Mesa CI to switch over at the right time, so we don't end up > breaking/interrupting those services. Should be easy, just requires > a bit of coordination.
Yup, I threw Daniel onto the CC of this e-mail explicitly for that reason. We may also want to coordinate with the rest of fd.o so that everyone chooses the same new mainline branch name. I just added Michel to the CC as he's doing lots of CI stuff and might be a good person to help coordinate there. I certainly don't want to pull the rug out from under anyone. --Jason _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev