On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Siavash Eliasi
<siavashser...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---
>  src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c b/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
> index b27f592..5581a5d 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
> @@ -416,9 +416,9 @@ _mesa_buffer_data( struct gl_context *ctx, GLenum target, 
> GLsizeiptrARB size,
>  {
>     void * new_data;
>
> -   (void) ctx; (void) target;
> +   (void) target;
>
> -   new_data = _mesa_realloc( bufObj->Data, bufObj->Size, size );
> +   new_data = _mesa_align_malloc( size, ctx->Const.MinMapBufferAlignment );

realloc can be used to either allocate a new buffer or re-allocate an
existing buffer (which may or may not return a different pointer).

Given that, I think that this will leak the old buffer (if one has
already been allocated).  From looking at the rest of the surrounding
code in the patch, we don't preserve the existing buffer contents, so
I guess I'd just FREE(bufObj->Data)  within the following if block
before assigning bufObj->Data = newdata;

--Aaron

>     if (new_data) {
>        bufObj->Data = (GLubyte *) new_data;
>        bufObj->Size = size;
> --
> 1.8.4.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to