Carl Worth <cwo...@cworth.org> writes: > Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> I will not have the chance to run piglit on a i965 system until next >> week so I would love if someone can take a look at this. > > I should be able to take a look at this today or tomorrow.
I didn't see any failures on i965. Oddly, piglit doesn't seem to be
running this test for me, (maybe I'm missing all glean testing from
piglit?!---I'll debug that later.). For now, I'm running this test
manually with:
./bin/glean -o -v -v -v -t +fragProg1
>> As a former stable-release manager would you have any suggestions -
>> should I pull it out from the upcoming 10.2.7 ? I would not be too
>> fussed it only swrast regresses, yet I'm suspecting that other classic
>> drivers could be affected.
>
> Right. If piglit shows a regression, (on anything), I would recommend
> not including the patch.
I still stand by that policy.
But, while I did find a failure of this test on swrast, I wasn't able to
identify this patch as a regression. I see this same testing failing
similarly on both mesa-10.2.6 and 10.2-branchpoint.
Let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
-Carl
--
carl.d.wo...@intel.com
pgpcOQA4iWcM_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
