On Wednesday, September 03, 2014 06:50:39 PM Carl Worth wrote: > Carl Worth <cwo...@cworth.org> writes: > > Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >> I will not have the chance to run piglit on a i965 system until next > >> week so I would love if someone can take a look at this. > > > > I should be able to take a look at this today or tomorrow. > > I didn't see any failures on i965. Oddly, piglit doesn't seem to be > running this test for me, (maybe I'm missing all glean testing from > piglit?!---I'll debug that later.).
Glean is excluded by the '-p gbm' option because Glean uses GLUT, not Waffle, and therefore only runs on GLX. (It has no EGL/X11, Wayland, or GBM support.) Our plan has been to replace Glean with native Piglit tests. We've been making some progress toward that, but there's a pile more work to do. > For now, I'm running this test > manually with: > > ./bin/glean -o -v -v -v -t +fragProg1 > > >> As a former stable-release manager would you have any suggestions - > >> should I pull it out from the upcoming 10.2.7 ? I would not be too > >> fussed it only swrast regresses, yet I'm suspecting that other classic > >> drivers could be affected. > > > > Right. If piglit shows a regression, (on anything), I would recommend > > not including the patch. > > I still stand by that policy. > > But, while I did find a failure of this test on swrast, I wasn't able to > identify this patch as a regression. I see this same testing failing > similarly on both mesa-10.2.6 and 10.2-branchpoint. > > Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. > > -Carl
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev