On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> wrote: > This will, eventually, allow us to manage execution widths of instructions > in a much more natural way from the fs_visitor level. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstr...@intel.com>
Adding a width field to fs_inst might be fine, but I don't think I like adding the parameter to every fs_inst constructor. It seems like it's something that's rarely going to be non-default. With other things like that we just set them after creating the instruction. Also, am I correct that the width field isn't actually hooked up to anything at this point? _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
