On 07/03/15 07:23, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 06/03/15 18:26, Brian Paul wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com
<mailto:emil.l.veli...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Used for aligned_alloc and other C11 functions missing from the
header.

    Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com
    <mailto:emil.l.veli...@gmail.com>>
    ---
      include/c11_stdlib.h | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


I wonder if this should be include/c11/stdlib.h instead.

I also wonder if I should have put c99_math.h in c99/math.h  Jose
followed my pattern with c99_alloca.h

We should probably be more consistent about this.  What do you think?

No, {c11,c99}_foo.h are really different from {c11,c99}/foo.h


include/c99 is added to the include path.  It is meant to have
_complete_ header replacements (stdint.h, inttypes) for compilers that
don't provide these C99 headers -- MSVC prior to 2013.  This way the C
include can always just have

   #include <stdint.h>

regardless of the compiler.

If c99_math.h is moved to c99/math.h then it will make it impossible to
ever include the real MSVC's math.h whenever include/c99 is added to the
path.

This is also why c11/threads.h is in  c11.  It too is an complete
implementation of C11'S threads.h.  And in fact we could just add
include/c11 to the include path and drop the "c11/" prefix.  But the
fact that GLIB started implement C11 threads.h, and because we still
didn't eliminate the use of non-portable _MTX_INITIALIZER_NP from Mesa
tree gave me pause.


Now, things like c11_math.h c11_stdlib.h are a different beast --
they're not complete replacement for the headers, but just wrappers
around the headers which fixup missing things.  They can't ever be put
in the include path.


We can can consider move the c99_foo.h/c11_foo.h them somewhere else
(another subdirectory, or util) or renaming them (like u_foo.h).  But
the distinction between the stuff in c99/ and c11/ must be preserved
somehow.

Oh nevermind this. Just saw your other reply.

Jose

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to