+ fi;
+ STATIC_STDCPP_LIBS="-l:libgcc.a -l:libgcc_eh.a -l:libstdc++.a";
+ STATIC_STDCPP_LDFLAGS="-static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ \
+ -l:libgcc.a -l:libstdc++.a \
Do we need this line considering the STATIC_STDCPP_LIBS above ?
Yes, I can't remember the exact failure mode but they both had to
be there to make things work: I can run a build without it and
save the error(s) if you're interested in the details.
GALLIUM_COMMON_LIB_DEPS = \
-lm \
+ $(STATIC_STDCPP_LIBS) \
Don't the classic dri modules need this? Afaict you'll end up removing
the references (link) to the C++ runtime and libgcc_s and things won't
end up too well.
I've been doing a bit of work to make the patch compatible with static
llvm (I had link failures), I'll check those as well. Currently I have
no .so which pull in libstdc++ or libgcc_s, so I think I've got it covered.
I'll post another patch when I've addressed your other comments.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
