Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 15:19 -0600, Brian Paul wrote: >> I'm hoping to wrap this up soon, so timely feedback would be >> appreciated. Thanks. > > What would people think about using tracker/blocker bugzilla entries, as > is done for X.Org releases (e.g. > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10101 is the tracker bug > for X.Org 7.4)? > > E.g. I think https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14441 and > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15477 should be fixed > before 7.1, as they're regressions from 7.0.x.
Yeah, there are a few bugs that really should get fixed for 7.1. (As you know, Michel) we've been busy with enough other things that it's hard to track, much less fix, all the open bugs. I'd be OK w/ the X.org-style blocker entry. Otherwise, just marking bugs with high/highest priority would probably be an improvement. Now that DRM 2.3.1 is out and Xserver 1.5 is eminent, I'd like to put a stake in the ground and get 7.1 out there. So I don't think I'll hold up things too long. -Brian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
