On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 08:16 -0800, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> On 08.12.2009 16:49, michal wrote:
> > Roland Scheidegger pisze:
> >> On 08.12.2009 15:55, michal wrote:
> >>   
> >>> This branch simplifies pipe/p_format.h by making enum pipe_format what 
> >>> it should have been -- an enum.
> >>>
> >>> As a result there is no extra information encoded in it and one needs to 
> >>> use auxiliary/util/u_format.h to get that info instead. Linking to the 
> >>> auxiliary/util lib is necessary.
> >>>
> >>> Please review and if you can test if it doesn't break your setup, I will 
> >>> appreciate it.
> >>>
> >>> I would like to hear from r300 and nouveau guys, as those drivers were 
> >>> using some internal macros and I weren't 100% sure I got the conversion 
> >>> right.
> >>>     
> >> Looks nice, though it is unfortunately based on pre gallium-noblocks
> >> merge, so I suspect you'll get a conflict for almost every patch chunk
> >> at least in drivers if you try to merge it...
> >>
> >>   
> > I didn't touch pipe blocks -- I left the pf_getblock* and friends in 
> > pipe_format.h intact.
> Yes, but you're bound to get lots of conflicts because you replaced for
> instance pf_format_get_block with util_format_get_block whereas that
> stuff is removed from master because pipe_format_block (and the
> block/nblocksx/nblocksy variables in pipe_texture and pipe_transfer) are
> gone completely.
> I quickly tried a merge and there were conflicts in over 40 files - from
> a quick glance though they should be trivial to resolve. And I don't
> think there's too much hidden stuff which won't work any longer - just
> let util_format_get_block die and it should probably work out ok.
> 
> > 
> > How severe is the gallium-noblocks change? I would like to avoid mergin 
> > master into this branch.
> It's not really that severe, it just touched a lot of the same places in
> drivers this change does.
> btw, I also avoided merging master to feature branch when I merged
> gallium-noblocks, and instead fixed up conflicts on merge to master (and
> adpated stuff which needed changes later). Is there some policy for this?

Ian's video of Linus talking about merges may give some clues?

Keith


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev

Reply via email to