Brian Paul wrote: > Maciej Cencora wrote: >> Hi, >> >> following 3 piglit tests are failing on r300 because they're trying to use >> GL_ARB_texture_non_power_of_two without checking if this extension is >> available: >> >> fbo-blit >> fbo-nodepth-test >> fbo-nostencil-test >> >> I'm not sure what solution is preferable, 1) change the teximage sizes to be >> POT, 2) require ARB_texture_npot. >> I've tried first solution for fbo-blit but it segfaults, trying to execute >> function at null address, so it would require some more investigation. > > We should use POT texture sizes so that the test always does _something_.
I've fixed the fbo-blit test to use a POT texture. Maybe you can fix the other tests similarly. BTW, I'm adding additional sub-tests to fbo-blit.c to investigate some other bugs I've recently found... -Brian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
