Interestingly, the post-trial judge opinion at
http://wi.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.%5CFDCT%5CWWI%5C2008%5C20080801_0000734.WWI.htm/qx
contains the following text:

<<
Plaintiff’s expert, Dr. Stevenson, testified that the ‘327 patent is
directed to “a special
purpose hardware component designed and optimized specifically for
high speed graphics
processing. "
The specification makes it plain that the invention does not relate to
software for graphics. As the inventors noted, such programs “are well
known in the art."
[...]
Claim 17 does not say in so many words that the method it discloses is
a rasterization
circuit operating on a floating point format, but that is what it describes.
Reading the disputed claims as disclosing hardware is not reading a
preferred embodiment in the claims; it is simply
reading the claims as the person of ordinary skill would read a patent
directed to special purpose hardware.
>>

This seems to indicate that it would be safe to implement floating
point textures/framebuffers in Mesa, as both SGI and ATI and the court
seemed to agree that the patent applies specifically to hardware.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev

Reply via email to