On Saturday 03 April 2010 18:58:36 Marek Olšák wrote: > On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Zack Rusin > <za...@vmware.com<mailto:za...@vmware.com>> wrote: I thought the initial > proposal was likely a lot more feasible for a GSOC (of course there one > has to point out that Mesa's GLSL compiler already does unroll loops and > in general simplifies control-flow so the points #1 and #2 are largely > no-ops, but surely there's enough work on Gallium Radeon's drivers left to > keep Tom busy). Otherwise having a well-defined and reduced scope with > clear deliverables would be rather necessary for LLVM->TGSI code because > that is not something that you could get rock solid over a summer. > > It doesn't seem to simplify branches or unroll loops that much, if at all.
It does for cases where the arguments are known. > It fails even for the simplest cases like this one: > > if (gl_Vertex.x < 30.0) which is unknown at the compilation time. z ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
