On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 17:49, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:52:16 -0400, RALOVICH, Kristóf 
> <kristof.ralov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
>> please see the attached patch for piglit. The patch includes 2 new
>> tests based on the demos I provided for mesa.
>>
>> Let me know if I can further help!
>
> The main thing I'm concerned about is that you seem to be looking for
> pixel-precise results.  Do you expect that from this code?  Generally in
> piglit we try to construct some environment that gets a few consistent
> results and probe a few representative pixels out of it.

I'll update the patch based on Brian's conclusion to address this.

>
> Beyond that, since you didn't use git send-email, the patch came out
> mangled and I couldn't apply it to try it out.
>

The patch is actually an attachment to the email. Try saving it as
that, not copy-pasting from the email's text.

Kristof

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev

Reply via email to