> On 2012-02-15 18:23:43, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > src/Makefile.am, line 650
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/3886/diff/1/?file=74803#file74803line650>
> >
> >     Does this add it to the distribution? We really want the .sh.in 
> > versions added.
> 
> Charles Reiss wrote:
>     All the .in files mentioned in configure.ac are placed in the 
> distribution automatically (in the Makefile/Makefile.in in the root of the 
> source tree).

That was my hunch, thanks for confirming!


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3886/#review5130
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2012-02-13 23:36:01, Charles Reiss wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/3886/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-02-13 23:36:01)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Hindman.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> This fixes several assumptions Makefile.am has about python and java bindings 
> being enabled and the webui being enabled:
> 
> 1) libwebui.la is now linked to binaries only if it is actually built
> 2) the examples/{java,python} files, which are generated conditionally by 
> configure are only required if the corresponding feature is enabled. They are 
> also made dependencies of mesos-tests, since it runs them.
> 
> Also, we previously asked for the _generated_ examples/{java,python} files to 
> be included in the distribution, but only their corresponding .in files 
> should be (which should be done automatically by automake).
> 
> 
> This addresses bugs MESOS-120 and MESOS-154.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-120
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-154
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am f0806ab 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3886/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make clean && make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Charles
> 
>

Reply via email to