I have no strong opinion, but 0.0.1 sounds like a really early prototype. The project has been active for several years and it's used in production, so 0.5 or 0.1 would make sense.
--Ali On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Matei Zaharia <[email protected]> wrote: > Why don't we start with 0.5 or even 1.0, given that we already had numbered > alpha releases and the project has been around for a while? > > Matei > > On Feb 16, 2012, at 6:40 PM, Andy Konwinski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I chatted with Ben about this, and we propose that we use 0.0.1 for the >> version number for our first apache release, and we adopt versioning rules >> like these http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html (i.e. the version scheme >> is major.minor.patch). >> >> Does anybody have thoughts or objections? >> >> I've added a new "version" in JIRA called "0.0.1" that (pending this >> discussion) we can start using to keep track of which Issues are intended >> to go into the first release (see >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS/fixforversion/12319875 which is >> currently pretty boring because I've only assigned one issue to it, as a >> test) >> >> Note: we used version numbers before entering the incubator to identify our >> github tagged alpha "releases", the most recent one being alpha 0.4 (see >> https://github.com/mesos/mesos/tags) >> >> Andy
