Ok. Unless anybody has more thoughts I'll create a [VOTE] thread for using 0.9 for the release.
>From my phone. On Feb 17, 2012 1:24 PM, "Haoyuan Li" <[email protected]> wrote: > No strong opinion either. But if I was an user, I probably would not > consider it seriously if I saw the version number is 0.0.1... > > Best, > > Haoyuan > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Ali Ghodsi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have no strong opinion, but 0.0.1 sounds like a really early > > prototype. The project has been active for several years and it's used > > in production, so 0.5 or 0.1 would make sense. > > > > --Ali > > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Matei Zaharia <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Why don't we start with 0.5 or even 1.0, given that we already had > > numbered alpha releases and the project has been around for a while? > > > > > > Matei > > > > > > On Feb 16, 2012, at 6:40 PM, Andy Konwinski <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> I chatted with Ben about this, and we propose that we use 0.0.1 for > the > > >> version number for our first apache release, and we adopt versioning > > rules > > >> like these http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html (i.e. the version > > scheme > > >> is major.minor.patch). > > >> > > >> Does anybody have thoughts or objections? > > >> > > >> I've added a new "version" in JIRA called "0.0.1" that (pending this > > >> discussion) we can start using to keep track of which Issues are > > intended > > >> to go into the first release (see > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS/fixforversion/12319875which is > > >> currently pretty boring because I've only assigned one issue to it, > as a > > >> test) > > >> > > >> Note: we used version numbers before entering the incubator to > identify > > our > > >> github tagged alpha "releases", the most recent one being alpha 0.4 > (see > > >> https://github.com/mesos/mesos/tags) > > >> > > >> Andy > > >
