-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6668/#review10462
-----------------------------------------------------------


this is pretty cool!


third_party/libprocess/include/process/async.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/6668/#comment22313>

    



third_party/libprocess/include/process/async.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/6668/#comment22314>

    ah, I see, this is the public interface people would use
    
    do/should we typically try to get the public interface at the top of the 
header?


- Ben Mahler


On Aug. 17, 2012, 12:29 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/6668/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 17, 2012, 12:29 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, John Sirois, and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Created a new abstraction called async() (which is similar in C++11 async).
> 
> The idea is a user could use this abstraction to delegate blocking calls (eg: 
> system calls).
> 
> The implementation is a bit messy, because C++ compiler is not very smart. 
> But, the usage is pretty simple.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   third_party/libprocess/include/process/async.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   third_party/libprocess/src/tests.cpp 8f4b2ae 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6668/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> (inside libprocess)
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to